Pursuant to the Articles of Association of the Company, the Board of Directors is responsible for the management and the affairs of the Company.

The Board of Directors consists of a maximum of eleven members appointed and removed by the shareholders’ meeting. The Board of Directors adopted rules governing its internal affairs (the “Rules”) at a Board of Directors’ meeting held on 7th July 2000. The Rules were amended at a Board of Directors’ meeting held on 5th December 2003 to take into account recommendations for changes to GlossaryCorporate Governance. The Rules specify the composition, the role and the key responsibilities of the Board of Directors, and also determine the manner of appointment and the responsibilities of the Chairmen and the Chief Executive Officers. The Rules also specify the creation of two committees (the Audit and the Remuneration and Nomination Committees) and specify their composition, role and operating rules.

The Board of Directors has also adopted specific Insider Trading Rules, which restrict its members from trading in EADS shares in certain circumstances (for more information, please see “Part 2/ Governing Laws”).

The parties to the Participation Agreement (as defined in the opening paragraph of  “Part 2, section Relationships with Principal Shareholders”) have agreed that the voting rights attached to the Indirect EADS Shares shall be exercised by EADS Participations B.V. to ensure that the Board of Directors of EADS comprises the Directors of EADS Participations B.V. and two additional independent Directors who are not officers, directors, employees or agents of or otherwise have no significant commercial or professional connection either with the DaimlerChrysler, Société de Gestion de Participations Aéronautiques (“SOGEPA”) or Lagardère Groups or the French State. Pursuant to the Participation Agreement, the Board of Directors comprises ten members of whom:

  • Four nominated by DaimlerChrysler;
  • Four nominated by Société de Gestion de l’Aéronautique, de la Défense et de l’Espace (“SOGEADE”); and
  • Two independent Directors, one nominated by DaimlerChrysler and one nominated by SOGEADE.

In addition, although from 8th July 2003, Sociedad Estatal de Participaciones Industriales (“SEPI”) no longer has a right to nominate a Director, based upon the proposal of DaimlerChrysler and SOGEADE, the shareholders’ meeting of EADS held on 11th May 2005 appointed an additional Spanish Director bringing the total number of Directors to eleven.

Pursuant to the Articles of Association, each member of the Board of Directors held office for a term expiring at the Annual General Meeting of the Company held on 11th May 2005. Such Annual General Meeting reconstituted the Board of Directors for a term of five years ending at the close of the Annual General Meeting which will be held in the year 2010. Members of the Board of Directors will be elected at each fifth Annual General Meeting thereafter.

The shareholders’ meeting may at all times suspend or dismiss any member of the Board of Directors. There is no limitation on the number of terms that a Director may serve.

The Board of Directors appointed two Chairmen, one chosen from the DaimlerChrysler-nominated Directors and one chosen from the SOGEADE-nominated Directors.

The Chairmen ensure the smooth functioning of the Board of Directors in particular with respect to its relations with the Chief Executive Officers whose efforts they support with regard to top level strategic discussions with outside partners.

The Board of Directors also appointed two Chief Executive Officers to be responsible for the day-to-day management of the Company, one chosen from the DaimlerChrysler-nominated Directors and one chosen from the SOGEADE-nominated Directors.

The Company is represented by the Board of Directors or by the Chief Executive Officers acting jointly. Furthermore, the Company has granted general powers to each of the Chief Executive Officers, authorizing them to each individually represent the Company.

In the event of a deadlock between the two Chief Executive Officers, the matter shall be referred to the two Chairmen.

The Chief Executive Officers shall not enter into transactions which form part of the key responsibilities of the Board of Directors unless these transactions have been approved by the Board of Directors.

The key responsibilities of the Board of Directors include amongst others:

  • Approving any change in the nature and scope of the activities of the Group;
  • Approving the overall strategy and the strategic plan of the Group;
  • Approving the business plan and the yearly budget of the Group;
  • Setting the major performance targets of the Group;
  • Appointing the members of the Executive Committee (see below) and the Corporate Secretary;
  • Approving proposals for appointments of members of Airbus Shareholders’ Committee and Executive Committee and chairmen of the Supervisory Board (or similar bodies) and the chief executive officers (or equivalent position) of important Group companies and BUs;
  • Approving material changes to the organisational structure of the Group;
  • Approving major investments, projects or product decisions or divestments of the Group contemplated in the business plan with a value exceeding €200 million;
  • Approving major strategic alliances and cooperations of the Group;
  • Approving any material decision affecting the ballistic missiles activity of the Group;
  • Approving matters of shareholder policy, major actions or major announcements to the capital markets; and
  • Approving other measures and business of fundamental significance for the Group or which involve an abnormal level of risk.

The Board of Directors met ten times during 2006 and was regularly informed of developments through business reports from the Chief Executive Officers, including rolling forecasts as well as strategic and operational plans. The average attendance rate at such meetings was 95%.

Following a detailed review of the A380 production and delivery program, Airbus informed the Board of Directors on 13th June that the A380 delivery schedule for the period 2006 to 2009 was revised. According to this, the Board of Directors decided immediately to release this new schedule and its financial impact, and subsequently on 3rd October 2006 (EADS statement and more detailed information about the ongoing regulatory and judicial proceedings can be found on “Note to the Financial Statements — Note 28: Litigation and claims”). On 2nd July 2006, the Board of Directors appointed a new Co-Chief Executive Officer, Louis Gallois, replacing Noël Forgeard in his functions, as well as Chrisitian Streiff as new President and Chief Executive Officer of Airbus, Members of the Executive Committee. After the resignation of the President and Chief Executive Officer of Airbus, Christian Streiff, three months later, the Board of Directors changed significantly the management structure of EADS by appointing on the 9th October 2006, EADS Co-Chief Executive Officer Louis Gallois additionally as Airbus President and Chief Executive Officer, the non-Airbus Divisions reporting to EADS Co-Chief Executive Officer Thomas Enders. Subsequently, on the 31st October 2006, the Board of Directors appointed EADS Chief Operating Officer Finance, Hans-Peter Ring, additionally as Airbus Chief Financial Officer. The Board of Directors also appointed on that date a new Chief Operating Officer of Airbus, Fabrice Brégier, and a new head of Eurocopter Division, Lutz Bertling, as Members of the Executive Committee. Overall, in 2006, nine Board of Directors meetings covered Airbus related matters. On 5th April 2007, Manfred Bischoff presented his resignation as chairman of the EADS Board of Directors and the Board of Directors decided to designate Rüdiger Grube as his successor in this position. Manfred Bischoff also presented his resignation as member of the Board of Directors.

Topics intensively discussed, and operations authorised at the meetings included: EADS’ strategy (comprising, in M&A matters, European industry consolidation and the buy-back of BAE Systems’ stake in Airbus), major business issues such as the A380 recovery efforts and the GlossaryPower8 program, the A350 industrial launch decision and Airbus future product strategy, the reviews of the EADS GlossaryUAV programs and of the A400M program, the review of Sogerma future strategy, the approval or postponement of operational plans, reorganisation topics, budgets, the Group’s financial results and forecasts, as well as financial optimisations and the discussions regarding the implementation of an ethics alert system. The Board of Directors also dealt with topics regarding personnel and human resources, such as management qualification, remuneration (including a long-term incentive plan and an employee share ownership plan) as well as attracting, retaining and developing individuals with high potential in order to ensure the future quality of EADS’ management and the multinational leadership structure.

Each Director shall have one vote, provided that if there is a vacancy on the Board of Directors’ in respect of a DaimlerChrysler-nominated Director or a SOGEADE-nominated Director, the DaimlerChrysler-nominated Directors being present or represented at the meeting can jointly exercise the same number of votes that the SOGEADE-nominated Directors who are present or represented at the meeting can exercise and vice versa. All decisions of the Board of Directors require a vote in favor by at least seven Directors voting in person or by proxy.

The quorum for the transaction of business at meetings of the Board of Directors requires the presence of at least one of the SOGEADE-nominated Directors and one of the DaimlerChrysler-nominated Directors.

In the event of a deadlock in the Board of Directors, other than a deadlock giving DaimlerChrysler the right to exercise the put option granted to it by SOGEADE (see “Part 2/ Relationships with Principal Shareholders — Put Option”), the matter shall be referred to Arnaud Lagardère (or such person as shall be nominated by Lagardère) as representative of SOGEADE and to the chief executive officer of DaimlerChrysler. In the event that the matter in question, including a deadlock giving DaimlerChrysler the right to exercise the put option (but in this case with the agreement of SOGEPA and DaimlerChrysler) is a matter within the competence of the General Meeting of EADS, a resolution on the issue shall be put to the General Meeting, with the voting rights of SOGEADE, DaimlerChrysler and SEPI being negated.

Pursuant to the Rules, the Board of Directors is empowered to form committees from its members. In addition to the Audit Committee and the Remuneration and Nomination Committee, the Board of Directors may form other committees to which it may transfer certain minor or ancillary decision-making functions although such assignment does not negate the joint responsibility of all Directors. The quorum for the transaction of business at any meeting of a committee shall be at least one Director appointed by SOGEADE and at least one Director appointed by DaimlerChrysler. All decisions of a committee require the simple majority of the members.

In addition to the Rules, the work of the Board of Directors is governed by internal directors’ guidelines (the “Directors’ Guidelines”) adopted, in a meeting dated 10th December 2004, in light of Corporate Governance best practices. The Directors Guidelines are composed of a Directors’ charter (the “Directors’ Charter”) detailing the rights and duties of the members of the Board of Directors, an Audit Committee charter (the “Audit Committee Charter”) and a Remuneration and Nomination Committee charter (the “Remuneration and Nomination Charter”) each such charter setting forth the respective committees’ enhanced roles.

The Directors’ Charter sets out core principles, which bind each and every Director, such as acting in the best interest of the Company and its stakeholders, devoting necessary time and attention to the carrying out of their duties and avoiding any and all conflicts of interest.

Composition of the Board of Directors

  Download Excel

Name

Age

Term started
(as member
of the Board
of Directors)

Term expires

Principal function
in the Group

 

 

 

 

 

Rüdiger Grube

55

2005

2010

Chairman of EADS

Arnaud Lagardère

46

2005

2010

Chairman of EADS

Thomas Enders

48

2005

2010

Chief Executive Officer of EADS

Louis Gallois

63

2005

2010

Chief Executive Officer of EADS and Head of Airbus

Jean-Paul Gut

45

2005

2010

Chief Operating Officer for Marketing, Strategy and Global Development of EADS

Hans Peter Ring

56

2005

2010

Chief Operating Officer for Finance of EADS and Chief Financial Officer of Airbus

Juan Manuel
Eguiagaray Ucelay

61

2005

2010

Member of the Board of
Directors of EADS

François David

65

2005

2010

Member of the Board of
Directors of EADS

Michael Rogowski

68

2005

2010

Member of the Board of
Directors of EADS

Nota:

The professional address of all members of the Board of Directors for any matter relating to EADS is Le Carré, Beechavenue 130-132, 1119 PR, Schiphol-Rijk, The Netherlands.

 Two additional members of the Board of Directors, Michel Pebereau and Bodo Uebber will be proposed for appointment during the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders to be held on 4th May 2007, with immediate effect as from the end of such meeting.

The Company has not appointed observers to the Board of Directors. Pursuant to applicable Dutch law, the employees are not entitled to elect a Director. There is no minimum number of shares that must be held by a Director.

Independent Directors

The two independent directors appointed pursuant to the criteria of independence set out above are François David and Michael Rogowski.

Prior Offences and Family Ties

To the Company’s knowledge, none of the Directors (in either their individual capacity or as director or senior manager of any of the entities listed above) has been convicted in relation to fraudulent offences, been the subject of any bankruptcy, receivership or liquidation, nor been the subject of any official public incrimination and/or sanction by a statutory or regulatory authority, nor been disqualified by a court from acting as a member of the administrative, management or supervisory bodies of any issuer or conduct of affairs of any company, during at least the last five years. As of the date of this document, there are no family ties among any of the Directors.

Assessment of the Performance of the Board of Directors

At the meeting dated 5th December 2003, the Board of Directors decided to carry out a self-assessment of its performance on an annual basis and a more thorough assessment every three years, possibly with the assistance of external consultants.

Pursuant to this decision, in late 2006 the Board of Directors has commissioned an independent and internationally reputable consulting firm (SpencerStuart) to assist the Directors in evaluating the functioning of the Board of Directors within the specific framework of the shareholders agreement. In the course of the evaluation, the outside consultant held individual meetings with all EADS Directors (Executive and non-Executive).

The results of the self-assessment were reported to and discussed by the Board of Directors with the clear objective to further improve the Board of Directors´ effectiveness and efficiency. The main outcomes of the self-assessment read as follows.

It appeared that the Board of Directors has been working as a cohesive entity, in an open, constructive and interactive atmosphere. The frequency of Board of Directors’ meetings and the set-up of the Committees (Audit Committee, Remuneration and Nomination Committee) have been judged as adequate by the members of the Board of Directors. The duration of meetings as well as the attendance rate was assessed as satisfactory.

Members of the Board of Directors almost unanimously indicated that the efficiency of the meetings was overall satisfactory and that the Board of Directors deals with the right issues, even if from time to time, urgent operational matters took too much time, compared to the discussions of long-term, strategic matters.

The members of the Board of Directors acknowledged the specific shareholding structure with strong shareholding blocks. Nevertheless they emphasized that decisions are always taken to the best interest of the company.

The review identified a number of possible areas of improvement for the future, such as the skill set and experience in the Board of Directors’ room (where specific financial expertise could bring added value), more regular reviews of the strategy and performance of the major divisions and the implementation of a more structured succession planning process for key executives, thanks to a stronger involvement of the Remuneration and Nomination Committee.

It has also been underlined that in order to streamline the decision making process, the documentation and information supplied beforehand to Board members should be reshaped.